Geert
Wilders has just given the most poignant defence of freedom of speech that I
have ever heard (above). Poignant because the man giving it has so little
freedom himself, living as he does in safe houses under 24 hour a day armed
guard. Geert Wilders has to live like that for the simple reason that he
criticises and resists Islam. That’s what happens to every public figure who
tells the truth about supremacist Islam. That and complete ostracism from
polite society. How ironic is that? That the man who has sacrificed the most
for the continued existence of civilisation in the Netherlands is shunned and
reviled by those who benefit most from it!
But a
growing number of Dutch are not deceived by this craven hypocrisy. No surprise
then that Wilders’ Party For Freedom (PVV) is topping the polls in the
Netherlands and likely to do very well in the forthcoming election on March 15th.
Here is a one politician actually doing his job: representing the people who
placed him in his position of trust.
Now
for representing a fifth of the Dutch people he is very likely to be convicted
of a hate crime on December 9th. That’s the price an honest and
brave politician pays for doing his job. In short the people Wilders
represents are sick and tired of the mass immigration of inassimilable and
aggressive Muslims and in order to represent them he has to say this. If he
can’t say this democracy is finished and the Dutch may as well get busy
sharpening knives.
In
today’s Orwellian world though merely expressing a view which 43% of your countrymen agree with is ‘far-right’. In other
words almost a half of those tolerant, bike riding, weed smoking Dutch are
considered by their liberal betters to be far-right. Or to put it in the way
those who use the term ‘far-right’ intend, almost half of the people in what is
widely considered the most tolerant country on earth are Nazis.
This
conjures up for me the image of Inigo Montoya expressing his doubt about the
genius Vizzini’s understanding of events in The Princess Bride (below). Imagine
the Spaniard is refering to liberals use of 'far-right'.
The
only reason Geert Wilders and his party are branded ‘far-right’ is their desire
to reduce immigration of Muslims and resist the Islamisation of the
Netherlands. This is clear from the utterly uncontroversial nature of the rest
of PVV’s program. In other words all you need to do these days to be “far-right’ is
to oppose fascistic Islam. Clearly those who make this charge don’t do irony.
But
being ‘far-right’ for resisting far-right Islam is only the half of it! That
becomes plain when you enter the looking-glass world of the modern liberal
journalist. For in contrast to us ‘Nazis’ who don’t like supremacist Islam your
average liberal journalist considers himself to be reasonable, civilised and
utterly middle-of-the-road. He is the very opposite of extreme in fact! And no
doubt he sees a thoroughly nice guy every time he looks in the bathroom mirror
in the morning.
But
for the sake of comparison to those of us on the ‘far-right’ let’s take a look
at what that nice liberal guy believes. What does it actually mean to be
mainstream these days?
If
you’ve read the Guardian (or even the ‘Torygraph’) or watched the BBC long
enough you get to find out what the people who bandy around the term
‘far-right’ think on other subjects. Here’s a few of their reasonable centrist
viewpoints:
•
Liberals don’t object to the primitive and savage practice of female genital
mutilation which deprives the victim of sexual pleasure her whole life.
•
Thoroughly modern and reasonable liberal journalists and jurists supported the
introduction of a parallel system of Sharia justice into Britain which
discriminates against women.
• No
bunny-hugging leftie talking-head ever seems to voice a doubt about cutting of
the throats of millions of conscious animals to meet the demands of religious
practice.
•
Most mainstream thinkers look down with contempt on the world’s most successful
experiment in freedom, America.
•
Those same beneficiaries of a free-society are often really keen to extoll the
virtues of dictators and mass-murderers like Fidel Castro.
• As
Brexit demonstrated almost the entire liberal establishment wanted to give up
British sovereignty to the unelected ideologues of the EU.
• And
just about every mainstream talking-head believes that a man can become a woman
simply by expressing a desire to do so. And anyone who believes the reality
that there are two sexes is bigoted.
This
is what it means to be middle-of-the-road!
And
objecting to these mainstream ideas makes you ‘far-right’.
Maybe
we should wear the insult as a badge of pride. In the same way that the 8th Army
adopted the Nazi slur that they were ‘desert rats’ and made it their own. Just
as Tottenham fans delight in calling themselves ‘Yids’.
Maybe
we on the far-right should say:
“If
that’s what it means to be liberal and reasonable…
Fuck
you! We are not only right about everything, we are far right!”
To follow me on Twitter click here.
To follow me on Twitter click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment