The BBC Prefers Terrorists

If only the BBC hated terrorists as much as they do Carl Benjamin

Around 5,000 people held a free speech rally in central London featuring major speakers and the BBC along with every major broadcaster ignored it. 

This should be surprising. After all the BBC is supposedly the archetype liberal media body in the UK and free speech is a core liberal value.

In Britain today: ordinary conservative speakers are getting barred from the country; university debates are getting shut down by black-shirted goons; eccentric Scottish vloggers are getting fined for posting Hitler-saluting pugs; and God save us, even blasphemy is back. What next?

The right to freedom of speech is being stolen away from us and the BBC ignoring such a topical and important event should be surprising.

But it isn't.

The BBC prefers terrorist apologists to freedom of speech advocates. Hard to believe I know, but their behaviour over many years leads to no other conclusion.

Islamists are a tiny minority of the Muslim population in Britain, or so we are often told by BBC talking heads and politicians. 

But if that is the case, why are Islamists such a high proportion of the Muslim commentators invited to its studios?

One case in point is Anjem Choudary. Does anyone doubt that he would be giving us the benefit of his supremacist bile in a BBC studio right now if he wasn't radicalising prisoners at Her Majesty's pleasure? 

Wouldn't it make sense for the BBC to invite fewer Islamists than their proportion in the population so as to promote the narrative of the 'tiny tiny minority of nutters' spoiling everything for the 'vast vast majority of Muslims who are just like the rest of us'?

It would ...

But the reality is that the BBC prefers terrorists and their spokesmen.

And it's not a recent problem. Back in the 80s the BBC became so keen on giving blood-soaked Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness a platform for their victim narrative that Thatcher's government brought in a law forbidding the broadcast of those connected to terror organisations. 

That law was only lifted on the announcement of the first IRA ceasefire in 1994.

Why?

Why do the BBC prefer terrorists to freedom of speech advocates?

The first clue comes in the name that the BBC et al use for anybody advocating liberal values these days: 'far-right'.

And in this if in almost nothing else the BBC and Guardian have a point. We are indeed far-right. Anyone fighting for free speech today is in fact far far right of the cultural Marxists at the BBC. That's right, what used to be  centrist liberals are now called 'far-right'! That's how far left our elites have travelled. 

And as good Marxists they think entirely in groups, namely oppressor groups and victim groups.

That's why the story of the century about how numerous Muslim rape gangs have been enabled by the authorities to commit tens of thousands of rapes (and even some murders) of under-age white girls for decades had no legs. 

On planet BBC the girls are from the white oppressor group and the Muslim rapists from an oppressed group. In short, the story is all wrong and running it will only hurt oppressed Muslims more. So they drop it as soon as they can.

Of course, the BBC don't come out and say this. They may be blinkered ideologues but they are not stupid. They know that the rest of us would hate them for such perverse callousness.

That's why our leftie media gave much more coverage to the non-story of a hostess who had no proof but heard some gossip about rich white men behaving boorishly than the latest instalment of the above story of the century.

And that's why we are always told to forgive and move on as quickly as possible after the latest Muslim terror atrocity. In their warped way the BBC regard the Muslim community as the main victim, and the bloody corpses still cooling in the morgue as so much spilt milk that we would do best to tidy up and forget as quickly as possible.

The BBC prefers terrorists.

And they are terrified that the British people will find out that they've been lying for years about those they call 'far-right' (i.e., Nazi) but who are in reality good-natured, reasonable people fighting for freedom.

That's why they ignored the Day For Freedom protest.



To follow me on Twitter click here.