Is Islam compatible with British freedom and democracy?
I don't think that it is. I think that Islam is an aggressive, supremacist faith that cannot tolerate those who disagree with it. And without tolerance you cannot have either freedom or democracy.
But that's just my opinion. Who am I? You don't know me from Adam, so there's no reason for you to take any notice of what I think.
What should be more persuasive to you though is that the British government clearly agrees with me.
Exhibit 1) Hundreds of Islamic State volunteers have been allowed back into Britain without any consequences despite having volunteered to fight for an avowed enemy of Britain and having taken part in the most disgusting atrocities since the Nazis.
Ask yourself why this was when opinion surveys show that 75% of the public wanted them punished. Jailing these scum would have had three huge advantages.
It would boost the governments poll numbers.
It would prevent vary dangerous people from committing mass murder on British streets.
And it wouldn't even be necessary to jail many as the war criminals of IS wouldn't even return to Britain to face justice.
What could possibly outweigh this seemingly overwhelming case for toughness on war criminals?
Very simply the government thinks that our Muslim population would be upset to see Muslim traitors and war criminals held to account. The goverment obviously believes that a very large proportion of Muslims support these psycho murderers!
Exhibit 2) Amazingly enough the Conservative administration of Theresa May is banning conservatives from coming to the UK.
Brittany Pettibone a cute American vlogger of utterly inoffensive conservative views was detained for three days at Luton before being deported to Austria, because she intended to interview Tommy Robinson.
Her Austrian boyfriend, Martin Sellner, was detained at the same time to prevent him speaking about freedom of speech at Speakers' Corner! There's a sentence that could not even have been conceived of a decade ago.
Then there's the Canadian, Lauren Southern, who was falsely detained under suspicion of being a terrorist before being unceremonally dumped in Calais. Her crime was apparently to have set up a stall in Luton with a spoof banner claiming that 'Allah is Gay'.
Once again what could possibly be so menacing as to cause a 'conservative' government to bar conservatives from entering Britain? And what could possibly be worth banning free speech at Speakers' Corner?
Once again it's obvious that our government considers that defending our centuries long sacred tradition of free speech is as nothing compared to the preventing Muslims from getting upset.
Exhibit 3) The authorities have enabled dozens of Muslim rape gangs to commit hundreds of thousands of rapes against many thousands of mostly underage white girls for decades.
Why the hell would they do that? Are they monsters? Don't any of them have daughters?
Once again. Our authorities are so frightened of upsetting Muslims (by jailing the rapists among them) that they see enabling the crime of the century as the lesser evil!
So don't trust me. Take a look at just how far the British authorities are willing to go to avoid upsetting Muslims and ask yourself the question:
Is Islam compatible with British freedom and democracy?
To follow me on Twitter click here
The obvious and short answer, NO!
ReplyDeleteThe logic of your position is as inescapable as the government's is inexcusable.
ReplyDeleteThank you for stating it so eloquently.
It is logical (thanks) but it's also incredible. Can't these idiots follow the trajectory of what they're inflicting on Britain?
ReplyDeleteOne does not have to look far at Britain's democracy at work.
ReplyDeleteIslam is compatible, the common part is the glorification of terror, as the many marxist will find this necessary, slowly in the beginning and then to final authoritative totalitarianism.
Freedom is being traded, for security, totalitarianism.
It is sad to see, as the it is the weight of the social welfare state, free housing, free education, free health, and any costs are subsidized, so that no one places any real value on these things.
If they did they would be careful how they are used, safeguard them, and the number of people who can avail themselves of these wonderful services.