![]() |
| The Islamic MO |
A couple of days ago around
10 masked terrorists, dressed in black, went into the main train station in Kunming in China and
began slashing people with knives and meat cleavers. At least 29 were killed
and 140 injured.
The MO is all too
familiar. The face to face savagery together with the obvious desire to kill as
many as possible.
I googled the words “China” and “terror’. Here’s the headlines
from the first two pages of my search.
China Reacts to Terrorism
‘Double Standard’ After Kunming Mass Murder
Time
Time
Train Station Terror Attack Highlights China's Ethnic
Tensions
Bloomberg
Businessweek
China’s
Uighur Terror Attack
The
Daily Beast
Deadly knife attack
Terror in Kunming
The Economist
Chinese authorities say two WOMEN
were part of knife-wielding terror gang which left at least 33 dead and 143 wounded
after attacking a train station in China
Daily Mail
Daily Mail
At least 28 die in 'terrorist'
attack at Chinese train station: reports
Reuters
Families reel, witnesses haunted after China's deadly
Kunming terror attacks
CNN
China's security
chief vows justice after terror attack in train station leaves at least 29 dead
The
Telegraph
At least 27 dead in “terror” attack at
Chinese train station
Euronews
'Violent terror attack' at
busy Chinese train station by knife-wielding assailants leaves 33 dead, 143
injured
The Independent
China vows to punish
deadly station rampage, blames separatists
Yahoo.com
Kunming terror case resolved,
says China
Times of India
Kunming knife attack: Xinjiang
separatists blamed for 'Chinese 9/11'
Guardian
27 dead, 109 injured in
'terror' attack at Chinese train station
Hindustan Times
A question:
Why don’t the words Islamic
or Muslim appear anywhere in these headlines?
Most of the articles
eventually get round to the dreaded M-word in the fifth or sixth paragraph. But
only after they’ve emphasised that the cause of this latest barbaric atrocity is
“ethnic tensions,” Chinese oppression or “separatism”. The perpetrators’ religion
is usually only mentioned as background towards the end of the story.
Excluding mention of
Islam in connection to these outrages is equivalent to reporting Kristallnacht
without reference to Nazism. Perhaps a modern editor would come up with a
headline like this:
Ethnic tensions flared up in Germany yesterday causing at least 90 deaths
Does anybody doubt that
if terrorists were doing this in the name of Christianity or Hinduism that
their religion would be in the headlines? The motive behind this obscene
delicacy in reporting the truth about Islam is not only fear. There is also the
calculation that given the size of the Muslim population in the world and here
in our own countries that the only way to tame Islam is to keep Muslims onside by not offending them.
But this thinking is
wrong-headed. There has never been a group of people more in need of offensive rebuke than Muslims. The only hope to reform Islam is to tell the truth about it. This
is all we can do to assist reform minded Muslims in their fight against their
barbarous co-religionists.
Maybe some of you think
this selective blindness of the media is old news. And you’d be right, it is.
But until the media
starts telling people the truth behind the endless savage murders committed in
the name of Mohammad then they may as well not bother reporting the gory details.
Until the media starts
telling the truth about Islam, the media itself is the story.

A friend of mine is well aware of the demise of very competent headteachers at the hands of those with a strong affiliation to a certain religion because he knows one of the heads personally. He said this to me recently: "I heard our own head say that Birmingham heads are now reluctant to report Islamic threats because Ofsted in their wisdom automatically downgrade the school to inadequate."
ReplyDeleteThat this can even be said is frightening.