![]() |
Vince Cable has clearly been tearing his hair out more effectively than his fellow
doomster Cassandra!
|
I’m forever blowing bubbles
Pretty bubbles In the air
They fly so high
Nearly reach the sky
Then like my dreams
They fade and die
Fortune’s always hiding
I’ve looked everywhere
I’m forever blowing bubbles
Pretty bubbles in the air
Vince
Cable the Business Secretary was reportedly “slapped down” by George Osborne in
a cabinet meeting for suggesting that the Chancellor’s Help to Buy scheme was
re-inflating the housing bubble.
Vince
Cable may be wedded to the tested-to-destruction interventionist policies of a 70s
Labour Chancellor, but his warnings over Osborne’s bubble are right on the
money.
The
chart above shows an economic wonder. It’s as if a physicist had managed to repeal
the law of gravity. In the deepest recession since the 1930s Osborne somehow
stopped economic gravity and house prices rather than executing a neat swallow
dive all the way down to somewhere a lot more affordable were suspended in mid-air.
The bubble burst but Osborne was so attached to it that he wouldn’t let it dissolve.
Humpty fell off the wall and the Chancellor put him back together again.
Somehow
as the economy collapsed house prices never even fell below the unprecedented
multiple of 5 to earnings that they reached in at the end of the 80s boom. And now they’re heading back into the
stratosphere.
But
Osborne’s suspension of economic gravity like other tricks loses a bit of its
magic when the secret is revealed. The
Chancellor succeeded where King Canute failed by unleashing the four horsemen
of economic apocalypse. In short: the vast bank bailouts which let the bankers
get away with crippling the economy; the creation of £375bn from thin air which has debased the
currency (QE); the ultra low interest rates that penalise saving and encourage
borrowing; and last but not least the unprecedented government borrowing that
will double the national debt over the lifetime of the coalition.
As
to why Osborne didn’t let capitalism take its course and fix the problem, the
answer is simple. After 13 profligate Labour years, the adjustment to reality
would have been painful. Millions are employed in the wrong jobs and hundreds
of billions of capital are in the wrong place. Rebalancing the economy would
involve millions of redundancies and many painful bankruptcies. And Osborne and
Cameron wanted to be re-elected in 2015. So they set out to achieve a pain free
recovery. And what that amounted to was more of the same debt financed consumer
boom that got us into trouble in the first place.
It
should also be said in their defence that even if Osborne and Cameron had
wanted to save their country from the now certain bankruptcy they could only
have done it with the understanding and support of a majority of the British
people. And in the context the mendacious poison endlessly pumped out by the
BBC and our educational and media elites, that would have been an uphill
struggle to say the least.
Osborne’s Boom
But
perhaps I’m being too hard on the Bullingdon boys. Unbalanced though it is, many
pragmatists have argued like Eddie George, the former Governor of the Bank of
England, that “Even unbalanced growth is better than no growth at all.” After
all, rather than the frankly disappointing 1.5% growth predicted for 2013 back
in the summer it was announced in December that very likely Britain grew at the
rip-roaring pace of 1.9%. There was even a wonderfully stirring prediction that
the UK economy is doing so well that it would be the biggest economy in Europe
by 2030.
Sadly,
for the millions who will pay for Osborne’s folly the apparent health of UK plc
is a mirage. The pain free recovery is in effect a recovery free recovery.
More
than 90% of the reported growth is in consumption and housing construction. And
all of it if being paid for with
borrowed money. George Osborne’s solution to the impending economic catastrophe
of the most indebted country on earth has been to encourage another debt binge.
Hamlet Without The Prince
Back
in 2010 when the Chancellor set out his vision for Britain he correctly
diagnosed the problem. Britain was borrowing and consuming too much and
producing too little. The solution in his emotive phrase was “The march of the
makers”. And in these sentiments he was exactly right. Unfortunately the lying
toe rag didn’t mean it.
Now
4 years into his plan British GNP is just 2% shy of its 2008 peak. But in
obscene contrast to his stated goal, manufacturing is still more than 10% below
its pre-recession level and business investment is down a whopping 25%.
No
surprise then that the UK current account deficit with the rest of the world
rose to £20.7 billion,
or 5.2% of GNP in the third quarter of last year ─ the highest percentage for
24 years. This is, of course, just another form of borrowing and the liabilities we're building up abroad are staggering.
It’s
the lack of investment that makes Osborne’s so called recovery “Hamlet without
the prince”. As far as recoveries go investment is the be all and end all. No
investment, no recovery.
The
lack of investment tells us two important things. There is no confidence among
the wealth creators in the future of Britain, and after the credit card is maxed out the recovery will peter out due to capacity constraints.
Without
investment stagnation is the best possible outcome. But it’s not the most
likely one.
Economic Armageddon Looms
As
interest rates will surely rise towards their long run average the housing
bubble will burst again. And it won’t be the only one.
Government
debt stands at 70% of GNP.
Personal
and mortgage debt is approaching 100% of GNP.
Our
businesses and banks together have debts equivalent to 350% of GNP.
Saving
the banks incurred liabilities of 71% of GNP.
Labours
PFI boondoggle adds another 16%.
And
unfunded public sector pensions equal 306% of GNP
All
together these liabilities total 913% of GNP.
When
interest rates rise, bubbles will be bursting left, right and centre and bubble
blower Osborne will have to take kick boxing lessons from Deputy PM Clegg to
slap down all the Jeremiahs.


Money Week -the best selling financial title, keep running ads all over the web predicting total economic collapse. I speculate that this is to profit from putting people in touch with financial advisers on how to move assets out before the economy tanks.
ReplyDeleteThe figures for our economy what do they mean .Is it net profits or gross profits as on a companies accounts . Size of Economy means nothing HMV,Comet and Woolworth's had a bigger economy than 99p stores