![]() | |||
Women for rape |
Where
can you get away with open racism these days? Well, if you are a liberal
journalist who is fighting the good fight against “Islamophobia”, just about
everywhere. Take this article from the supposedly right-wing Daily Mail. It’s a
story of the bestial gang rape of a 16-year-old girl and the Mail remarks on some
strange features of the case.
The
first is that while 3 Somali men raped the girl in a cheap hotel room in
Manchester, 6 others looked on and did nothing to stop them. Could it be that
they saw nothing particularly wrong in the brutal rape of a helpless young woman?
The next is that the 3 defendants had an awful lot of support from their fellow
Somalis in the courtroom, who also harassed the parents of the victim throughout
the trial. So it looks as if the wider Somali community also sees nothing wrong
with these young men’s behaviour. And finally that the mothers, a girlfriend and
a couple of dozen other Somali women staged a public demonstration outside the
court in their support. They held up a banner exclaiming “No Justice For
Somalis” to protest the terrible injustice … of holding their men to account
for rape. So it appears that even Somali women support rapists and almost
certainly share the view of one of them, Bilal Ahmed, that the victim is a “slut…up
for anything”.
After
noting the above the Mail journalists grope around for an explanation that will
make sense of the attitude not only of the rapists but also the wider Somali
community. One thing they are sure of is that there is something desperately
wrong with Somali culture even if they don’t seem to have a clue quite what that
is.
Then
they put this story into a wider context by quoting shock findings that the
vast majority of gang rapes in Britain are committed by ethnic minorities and by
giving a few specific examples such as those from Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The
clear inference is that gang rape is an ethnic minority problem rather than
what it actually is, an Islam problem.
Not
once in the entire article is Islam even mentioned. The closest they come is to
note that the Somali rapists were staying in the hotel as part of their “Eid
celebrations”. It’s a bit like an article on Kristallnacht that fails to make
any reference to Nazism. That’s because it is women-hating Islam itself that is
the precondition for the explosive growth of gang rape in Britain over the last
couple of decades.
The
racist branding of all ethnic minorities as potential gang rapists is the last
resort of journalists desperate to avoid telling yet another bad news story
about Islam. Or in other words really being racist about Hindus, Sikhs, Chinese
and the rest of the two thirds of our ethnic minorities that aren’t Muslim is
preferable to telling the truth about Islam.
The
basic reason for that is not just multicultural pieties. Proof of that is the
willingness of the Mail journalists to point the finger at Somali culture. That
at least is acceptable for a populist “right-wing” tabloid. But even for the
populist Mail it is inconceivable to identify Islam as the problem. How can
they identify “one of the world’s great faiths” as an explicitly misogynistic,
racist and supremacist ideology? How can they do that when Muslims are
approaching a quarter of the world’s population? How could they daily offend
British Muslims with the truth about their religion? It would likely cause a
sectarian divide that would make the Northern Ireland “Troubles” look like the
Notting Hill Carnival. And how can they
do it too when the vast majority of today’s poor suffering refugees are Muslim?
It’s inconceivable. At least for a liberal.
That’s
why anybody condemning Islam must be stamped on by our liberal masters. They
don’t destroy critics of Islam because they are slandering a great and noble
religion. They have to destroy them because they are telling the truth.
That’s
why the Mail routinely labels all critics of Islam as “far-right”, a synonym
for Nazi. And that’s why an article describing a PEGIDA march or an
EDL punch up has more vitriol than one describing the murder of 130 innocent
French enjoying a Friday night on the town.
And
that’s why impeccably liberal journalists don’t hesitate to use racist language
in the cause of fighting Islamophobia.
Islam
trumps free-speech. Islam trumps human rights. And Islam trumps animal rights.
Why shouldn’t Islam trump race?
No comments:
Post a Comment