They Are All Guilty

                                             The BBC finally smells the coffee after almost two decades

For once the story was just too big and too shocking to ignore.

Two weeks ago the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham   published its findings. At least 1400 children had been “raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated.”

Even more shocking was the revelation that the police, local and central government had known for years what was happening and did nothing. In the late 90s there was “growing evidence that child sexual exploitation was a serious problem in Rotherham. This came from those working in residential care.” Then later “Further stark evidence came in 2002, 2003 and 2006 with three reports to the Police and the Council, which could not have been clearer in their description of the situation in Rotherham.”  The first report was suppressed in what should be regarded as a criminal cover up and the later two were ignored.

These revelations had all the ingredients of a story that would run and run. The victims were children as young as 11 which should have fed into Britain’s obsession with paedophilia. They concerned the most violent and bestial kind of rape which should have had the feminists apoplectic with rage and unappeasable for years. And the crimes were racist. Almost all the victims were targeted because they were white by “Asian” perpetrators.

                         

In a country where a trivial sexist or racist comment often results in dismissal and even prison time what would happen to state officials guilty of the most blatant connivance with serious racially inspired criminality?

                           

The answer is nothing. Two weeks after the horrific story broke it’s dead. Nobody has been charged with criminal negligence or fired for gross incompetence. And for those of us who are hoping that the press and other media might do their job in hounding the guilty to their doom, the only thing to be heard on the subject is crickets chirping away into the void of contemporary democracy in Britain.

It’s not as if there is any lack of material to get their teeth into. In addition to the many hundreds of victims waiting to be interviewed there was, for example, Guardian journalist Amelia Gentleman’s interview with Nazir Afzal. Mr Afzal is the Crown Prosecution Service’s head on child sexual abuse and violence against women and girls.

In the interview Britain’s senior Muslim lawyer tells outrageous falsehoods that could only arise from either rank incompetence and ignorance or prejudice and a Goebbels like desire to deceive. Either one of which should cost him his job. According to Afzal the girls were not selected on the basis of their race, white professionals were not deterred from acting by the demands of political correctness, and none of the victims claimed that the race of the perpetrators had prevented police investigation. All of these claims fly in the face of all the evidence presented in the independent report and subsequent revelations.

But apart  from a few lone voices in the wilderness questioning the competence and probity of the first Muslim to hold his position, this stunning insight into the thinking of a Chief Crown Prosecutor has passed almost unremarked and unchallenged.

                       

To illustrate the strangeness of the media’s lack of curiosity imagine if the story were of an EDL rape gang preying on Asian girls. Decades would not be enough for caring liberal journalists to emote about the victims and flagellate the rest of us about the evil that lurks in the white male and what must be done to neuter him.

Ironically the reason for the media’s silence is the same reason that Muslim rape gangs were permitted to run amok in Rotherham for 16 years. Upbraiding or God forbid firing the most senior Muslim lawyer is unthinkable. Imagine the message that would be sent out to the Muslim community. The whining from the race hustlers would make the outrage at the rape and mental torture of 1400 women and girls sound like an office squabble over a coffee cup.

There is a phrase beloved of the left, “We are all guilty”. It is generally deployed against the innocent to silence critics or extort money. The reason that the story of the decade has been dropped and that no one will be punished for their role is that for once their slogan is apt: They are all guilty. They are the political, media and educational elites of Britain that have almost as one pushed multiculturalism and moral relativism for decades. And now when they see the pictures of their guilty comrades  staring out from the front pages of the tabloids they collectively think, “There but for the grace of my connections go I”.  

If the authorities respond to the outrage of the mob and charge one or two of the most culpable, God knows where it would end. Those thrown to the wolves would immediately point the finger at a dozen other prominent people that had ordered them to behave as they did or had behaved in exactly the same way.

The scandal of the racist multicultural mindset and the devastation it has wrought to British society would be laid bare for all to see.

Much better to repeat as necessary, “Lessons have been learned”.

That’s why no one will pay.

And that’s why for all its newsworthiness the Rotherham child rape scandal has faded from the news.



To follow me on Twitter click here.