An Utter Perversion of the Truth

It’s coming to something when you hear more truth from the lips of a blood soaked, jihadist murderer than the prime minister of Britain.

These days you don’t need to be a Bernstein or a Woodward to expose government mendacity. You don’t need to arrange clandestine meetings in underground car parks. You don’t even need your very own “Deep Throat’. These days simply turning on the TV is enough to expose the greatest scandal of the day.

In his widely lauded speech in Downing Street on the Woolwich terror attack Cameron starts with:

“The people who did this were trying to divide us. They should know, something like this will only bring us together and make us stronger.”

So we are united as a community against “violent extremism”, are we? If this is the case I am confused as to why our country’s soldiers are banned from wearing their own country’s uniform on the streets of the country they defend. How could their uniform offend anybody in our united British community?

Why is it that even carrying our united community’s flag, the Union Jack, is an arrestable offence, as a pregnant woman discovered on the streets of Oldham a couple of days ago? And why do many members of our community react to their country’s flag like a bull to a red rag?

As he went on in his grave statesmanlike tones, Cameron wanted to make a couple of things absolutely clear. The first is:

“This country will be absolutely resolute in its stand against violent extremism and terror. We will never give in to terror or terrorism in any of its forms.”

Now this statement dealing as it does with future intent, cannot strictly speaking be called a lie.

But in the context of the decades long appeasement of Islamists in “Londonistan”’. In the context of our negotiations with and concessions to the Islamists in Iraq and Afghanistan. And in the context of our surrender to terrorists in Northern Ireland and the subsequent release of hundreds of terrorist murderers onto the streets, perhaps we shouldn’t place too much reliance on our leader's steely resolve in this regard.

Cameron’s second point tragically reveals that Lee Rigby wasn’t the only victim of the jihadi murderers:

“This was not just an attack on Britain and the British way of life. It was also a betrayal of Islam and the Muslim communities who give so much to our country.”

This is pure multicultural fantasy. Killing infidels has been central to Islam since the model for all men, the prophet Mohammad himself, oversaw the beheading of hundreds of Jewish captives.
                 

In Pakistan (literal translation “Land of the Pure”) in a recent survey 83% supported the stoning of an adulterers and 78% thought apostates should be executed.

But perhaps we shouldn’t go looking for real Islam in a country whose sole raison d’etre is the Islamic religion and which is our largest source of Muslim immigrants. What about our own Muslim population?

Well a Guardian/ICM poll found that 61% wanted Sharia Law in Britain and 1 in 3 Muslims under 25 thought that apostates should be killed.

This might be considered progress over the Pakistani levels if it wasn’t for the fact that less than 20% of their parents’ generation agreed with them. So, far from assimilating with us, our Muslim population are rediscovering real Islam.

As for Cameron’s point about the special Muslim contribution to Britain, he may be on to something. There’s the three times overrepresentation of Muslims in our prisons, for example. Not as a result of racism I might add as Hindus are greatly underrepresented, yet indistinguishable from Pakistanis to your average racist bigot. Then there’s the 100,000 unpunished cases of female genital mutilation reported by the Sunday Times last year. And the ten times overrepresentation of Pakistani heritage parents in the child deformity statistics on account of their insistence on marrying first cousins. And who could forget the Muslim entrepreneurs who have raised gang rape and child prostitution almost to an art form. And last but not least there should be an honourable mention of the vigour with which Muslim men keep the gentler sex in line.

In fact, Cameron’s assertion about the true nature of Islam is just about the best example you will ever find of Hitler’s dictum that: “The great mass of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than a small one.”

Later in concluding his thoughts on the meme that Islam is itself the greatest victim, Cameron even appears to dare anybody to disagree with him:

It is an utter perversion of the truth to pretend anything different!”

By contrast, when the literally blood-soaked Woolwich jihadi said, “We are forced by the Koran [to behead infidels on a London street]", repellant murderer though he was, he was at least telling the truth.

If only David Cameron were as honest.