![]() | ||
Bahar Mustafa: Judges people by the colour of their skin |
The
headlines seemed to describe an ambiguous case:
Student diversity officer in racism row could lose her job after allegedly tweeting 'kill all white men' - Daily Mail
Bahar Mustafa: Student diversity officer could lose job over 'kill all
white men' tweet - Mirror
Bahar
Mustafa: Goldsmiths University diversity officer 'could lose job' after being
accused by students of racism against white men
- Independent
Goldsmiths University diversity officer could be sacked after tweeting
‘Kill All White Men’ hashtag – BBC
An
amazing similarity of headlines, but what stands out from all of them and
several dozen more clones on Goggle is the use of the word “could”.
It’s
a bit odd when you think about it. I mean for God’s sake why “could”? Why
not “likely to be fired” or “certain to
lose job”. After all if any other sort of employee did something which is
explicitly against the fundamental responsibility of the job there would there
be such equivocation? For example “Police officer could be fired for dealing in
drugs” or “Primary school teacher could face dismissal for supplying children
to paedophile gang” would definitely jar a bit. Something basically wrong with “could”
in this context.
This
is especially odd because of an earlier episode where Bahar Mustafa, diversity
officer at Goldsmiths University in London, had referred to somebody as “white
trash” on her official Twitter account. Clearly this divisive
officer is comfortable with lumping people together solely on the basis of
their skin colour. Behaviour which is almost universally regarded as offensively
racist. On the occasion of that hubbub cuddly Bahar did deign to concede that use
of that racist epithet was “not professional”. But this very grudging admission
strongly suggests that she doesn’t see anything particularly wrong in judging people in this
stupid way.
The
world of diversity officers is obviously privileged in this respect and its
servants don’t have to respect the petty conventions and decency that apply to
the little people.
Another
strange aspect of the case is that Bahar is also being vilified for an act of
kindness. She’s young and perhaps not yet quite hardened into the tough diversity racket, so in an understandable moment of weakness she discouraged white
men from attending an “equality” event. This is like a slaveholder being abused
for mercifully excluding his slaves from
a meeting on the subject of “gelding my property”. Clearly Bahar is more
likeable than your average dead-eyed liberal enforcer. But it seems that no
good deed goes unpunished, so I expect that an older and wiser Bahar will show
no consideration for "white trash" in the future and will find some way of
requiring them to attend.
No
doubt it’s some strange form of the Stockholm Syndrome because even though she
clearly despises me and people like me for my colour, I can’t really bring
myself to hate Bahar in return. Her quirky appearance and obvious sense of
humour seem to suggest a hope that at some point in the future she may see the
error of her ways and turn away from the dark side.
If
she’s already receptive on that score I’d like to suggest a simple thought experiment
that may open her eyes to the reality of oppression at Goldsmiths and other
universities across Britain. What I’d like her to do is simply this. At the
next diversity event she should publically say one or more of the following
statements:
“Most terrorists are Muslim.”
“Margaret Thatcher was a brave
woman!”
“The most physically abusive
relationships are between lesbians!”
“Thank God for the security that our brave
police provide.”
Obviously
Bahar doesn’t have to believe these statements of what she very likely thinks is vile rubbish. But
for the experiment to work she does need to say them as if she does mean them.
Then despite the possibly very unpleasant response to them from her former
friends and colleagues she mustn’t retract them for at least a few days. If she
performs this very simple test, I guarantee that her eyes will be opened to what
life is like for the only truly oppressed minority at her university: free
thinkers. She may be surprised to find
out that all sorts of genders, colours and ethnic origins make up this group,
including quite a few white men (involuntary shudder).
But
if she can’t bring herself to utter the above statements with any conviction,
she may like to pause to consider that members of the above most oppressed minority
at universities have themselves to conceal their true beliefs and lie
constantly for years on end just to survive and have any prospect whatsoever of
graduating. If they can do that then surely she could steel
herself for a few days of unpopularity. After all as a “ethnic minority woman”
who has suffered “trauma” daily she will obviously be up to the challenge.
If
she is still reluctant she might like to consider the words of one of the world’s
the first university lecturers,
Aristotle: “The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.” She works
at a university among students and professors whose lives should be dedicated
to the search for truth. In a perfect university you would obviously be able to
discuss any proposition no matter how offensive or odd to arrive at the truth
through debate in the manner of brainstorming. Obviously the small-minded tabloid reading
masses outside the confines of this wonderful institution might get offended at
some of the things said but their bigoted idiocy shouldn’t affect anybody committed
to the search for the truth.
Join
us Bahar. And help us to fight for this most oppressed minority. You can be the
oppressor Saul who became a Paul. Or if you prefer a more gender appropriate
allusion the sex worker Magdalene who saw the error of her ways. Or perhaps you
would prefer the more religiously apt old Jew who lauded Mohammad’s prophetic wisdom as he was led to
execution on the prophet’s orders.
The
last one most closely matches your likely fate at the hands of your
broad-minded, leftie friends should you dare to utter any of the above off
message statements with any conviction.
But
however nasty they get you can draw strength from the words of that dead white
guy who did more than anybody else to remove the scourge of slavery from mankind,
William Wilberforce:
“You
may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not
know.”
Very good.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
ReplyDeleteMy experience of University (BA Humanities, MA Critical Theory) was exactly this. Although, in my essays and dissertations I was free to explore alternative ideas, there was a tremendous pressure to not challenge the orthodoxies of feminism in seminars, lectures, and socially, outside the lecture theaters. Our centers of free thinking are extremely conservative in this respect. On Bahar Mustafa, she terrifies me. The fact that even if she gets kicked out of this post there may well be jobs galore waiting for her in political parties (Labour, Greens), the BBC, trade unions, charities and lobby groups (Fawcett society), various social services departments, and God-forbid academia, where she could express her hatred in a very real way.
ReplyDeleteIdentity politics disgust me. Every aspect of them, every facet, every consequence. They seem to me like a disease sweeping the West, like a zombiefying plague in a B-movie. Life seems like a B-movie. Were people always this stupid, this blinkered? How can people not see the irony in this sordid little story? In the whole sordid waste of time, money and lives that the professional grievance industry represents?
ReplyDeleteThat photo above offends me beyond words. Not only because it illustrates (in the uniformly imbecilic 21st century-social-media mode) that Orwell was wasting his time. Not only because this person's department and post exist at all (and are of course replicated, pod-person-like, across Western universities), but also that the manifestly unprofessional incumbent was appointed in the first place.
GEE, I WONDER WHY SOMEONE CALLED BAHAR MUSTAFAR WAS APPOINTED.
I would be genuinely shocked if there was a white, British, male, heterosexual and non-disabled Diversity Officer at any university anywhere. That people are appointed (to any position) on the basis of their ethnicity/gender/sexuality rather than their intelligence or competence is such a complete and total reversal of the notion of equality that I wonder for people's critical faculties in their not noticing.
Identity politics disgust me too, because they are directed against the only equality worth having: equality under the law. In attacking that they are going for the heart of who we are here in the West and aim at nothing less than destroying our freedom.
ReplyDeleteBut speaking as a non-disabled white guy, I wouldn't be a commisar (sorry diversity officer) whatever you paid me. Dirty job, dirty money.