Warmonger

            
                          Not pretty, but how do you protest Islamification peacefully?

David Cameron is a warmonger. Seems incredible I know. Dave’s the sort of chap you’d love to see marry your daughter if she was a bit simple-minded and as long as you didn’t have to go down the pub with him too often. Yet that same nice chap is hatching an almost inconceivably evil plan to bring war to the streets of Britain. The battle lines have been drawn, zero hour approaches.

Free Britain?

The most basic freedom, the precondition for all the others, is freedom of speech. Even totally non-political people instinctively know this. That’s why Dave felt the need to hop off to Paris for that fantastic photo-op demonstration of support for Charlie Hebdo. But Dave’s presence there was just his latest exercise in vomit-inducing hypocrisy. Dave had no more right to walk that street than the Saudi King because under his coalition Charlie Hebdo could no more be published in Britain than it could be in the Arabian peninsula.

According to a recent YouGov poll when asked if people in Britain were free to speak their minds 41% replied that they weren’t. And in answer to another question more than a third admitted to self-censoring what they say.

Not too bad you might think. Only a third of British people are too namby pamby to tell it like it is. But consider this, if you take out progressive liberals, the unpolitical, extreme leftists and Muslim nutjobs who are all free to say just about anything they please you’re left with let’s say, oh, about 41% of the population. Freedom of speech still exists in Britain just so long as the speaker is left-wing or Muslim. If you’re not overjoyed with mass immigration, cultural suicide, the EU takeover and Islamism, you’d better watch your mouth.

And it’s not an idle fear. Virtually every day there’s a story of some poor bastard who’s had his life ruined for stating the blindingly obvious. The ones who make the news are usually the celebrity victims being made an example of as a warning to others. What you don’t hear about are the thousands of ordinary people who get their life wrecked day in and day out for the hate crime of talking sense.

And now there’s Prevent

Now just as the provocations of the British are reaching an intolerable level such as beheading a soldier on the streets of London or the defiling of yet another sacred monument, so the coalition has decided to tighten the screws still further on anyone rash enough to complain about our multicultural paradise.

They came up with a snappy name, The Prevent Strategy, and Theresa May has promoted this new law as doing whatever it takes in the fight against “extremists”. The Prevent Strategy law currently making its unopposed way through the Commons contains a whole raft of measures aimed at nipping the fanatical impulse in the bud. Just about every civil servant dealing with the public will be tasked with the responsibility of spotting and dealing with extremists.

This may sound attractive to the poor battered citizenry out there sick to the back teeth with fire-breathing imams, street level Islamic aggression and Muslim terror plots. But that’s only because Theresa May skated over what she means by “extremists” when she gave her heir-to-Thatcher barnstorming conference speech. Sadly it turns out that the latest repressive measures are aimed equally at murdering terrorists and those warning about murdering terrorists. To Theresa and Dave they are both “extremists”. It’s as logical as lumping together pyromaniacs and firemen. Except that to those of a totalitarian cast of mind it actually is logical to try to control everybody.

                  

A Tale of Two Threats

But let’s say for the sake of argument you got sick of the endless denigration of all you believed in. You decided not to be intimidated anymore by the leftist domination of the government, media and education institutions. Let’s say the last straw came when you observed a disgusting Muslim demonstration against British soldiers taking place behind an honour guard of British bobbies. You decide to stand up, be counted and exercise you right to demonstrate as a free born Englishman.

You may as well organise a gay parade in downtown Kabul because the result will be precisely the same.  

                 

The English Defence League (EDL) which came about very much as described  above was neatly decapitated when Tommy Robinson was made a threat he couldn’t ignore. The campaign against him went something like this. First the media reacted in totalitarian lock-step to present Tommy as a would-be Hitler with the EDL as his brown-shirted storm troopers. Our liberal progressive journalists had no moral qualms about misrepresenting the EDL and its leader in this way, because if there’s something they hate more than the memory of Thatcher it’s an uppity working class white.

Then the police were unleashed to destroy his life.

To appreciate the true state of affairs in Britain today you couldn’t do better than compare the treatment meted out to Tommy Robinson on the one hand and the man dubbed by a Spanish judge as “Osama Bin Laden’s right hand man in Europe”, Abu Qatada, on the other.

Islamist Qatada entered Britain on a false passport in 1993 and spent his entire time here on benefits even though he had hundreds of thousands of pounds in ready cash. Qatada’s most high  profile activity was as what the tabloids term a "hate-preacher" but what Muslims think of as a preacher of Islam. Copies of his greatest hit tirades  against America and the Jews were found among the effects of a 9/11 hijacker. But Qatada is a man of many parts and was also very active in the fields of financing terrorism and planning attacks. He despised the country that had given him refuge and compared the British to Jews (the worst Islamist insult) who he thought should be massacred.

                  

Tommy Robinson is a patriotic, self-employed business man who has been known to use a little coarse invective. Tommy originally founded the EDL because he was sickened at Muslim protests against British troops. But he  always stressed that the EDL was anti-racist, against violence and believed in multiculturalism. 

He should have saved his breath. Saying anything even mildly critical of Islam is beyond the pale. The all powerful liberal elite paradoxically see themselves as the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke. They are terrified that if they allow the slightest dissent from the narrative of "culturally enriched Britain" it will start a flood that will bring the whole rotten edifice down. They might be right.

So how does the treatment of Qatada and Robinson compare?

Qatada our avowed enemy was punished for his passport offence by being given leave to stay in the UK. The cost to the British taxpayer of his stay was north of £3m in benefits, legal fees, and security costs.

        

Robinson the patriot was punished for using a friend’s passport to enter the US with three month’s solitary confinement followed by a trial and a 10 month prison sentence! That’s right. In the context of the hundreds of thousands of spongers, criminals and Islamist wackos entering Britain illegally and going unpunished the British authorities had the gall to imprison Robinson for a passport offence!!! And not even a passport offence committed in this country!!!

As is well known Tommy later denounced the EDL and embraced the religion of peace. Apart from the above episode and numerous other cases of police intimidation, what I believe actually broke Robinson in the end was a disgusting and almost incredible act of betrayal by the police. No number of exclamation marks is going to do justice to this one.

The police broke Robinson by allying themselves with the Islamists.

Whilst our enemy Qatada received round-the-clock police protection against the most nebulous of threats to his life, Tommy Robinson was refused assistance against the very credible and daily threats to him and his family. Instead he was very unsubtly told no doubt in a voice more-in-sadness-than-anger that if he persisted in resisting Muslim aggression the police would not be able to  protect him or his family from some of the more vibrant elements of our Muslim community.

They couldn’t break him with harassment and false imprisonment, so they turned to their allies, the Islamofascists.

Who in the light of such a threat to his family and betrayed by those whose job is to protect him would do anything other than throw in the towel as Tommy did?

EDL made an example of

Just yesterday two likely lads who had beaten a man unconscious in an unprovoked attack left court giving the thumbs up having gotten off with suspended sentences. Apparently the judge accepted that they were “remorseful”. Personally speaking I couldn’t give a toss how remorseful they were if they’d beaten me unconscious and left me with a scar on my forehead. But I expect that’s because I don’t have the forgiving nature of the average British judge.

Let’s not be hasty, though. Maybe that story was just the exception that proves the rule of Britain’s otherwise tough justice system.

Oh, but then today we have the case of another lad who was also freed after casual, extreme violence. In this case he fractured the skull of a nineteen-year-old who had asked him for a light in McDonald’s.  I expect it was a cry for help. If it was, it was certainly received loud and clear.

Nope. Britain is thug heaven, which makes life on Britain’s mean streets very colourful and exciting. Something to celebrate in fact. Particularly if you don’t have to live with or have your children educated with Britain’s underclass.

But the same newspaper that reported on the jubilant thugs above also featured a headline a couple of weeks ago to warm the cockles of every by-the-book law and order fanatic:

The English Defence League thugs jailed for total of 75 years after hurling missiles and bottles at police in Birmingham riot

Maybe it’s the start of a new trend in zero tolerance of violence, the first swallow in a coming summer crackdown. I wouldn’t get your hopes up. 

Cracking the skulls of nobodies is one thing and perhaps even to be celebrated as part of the rich tapestry of modern Britain. But protesting the Islamification of Britain is quite another and an example had to be made.

After the July 2013 EDL demonstration in Birmingham according to the Birmingham Mail the West Midlands Police Assistant Chief Constable Sharon Rowe said:

“A great deal of time, effort and thought has gone into today’s events and it is reassuring to see that both demonstrations have largely passed off without serious incident.

     

“We are aware of some instances of criminal damage and a number of assaults have been reported, which will be the subject of our ongoing inquiries as we move forward from today’s operation.

So all in all a pretty mundane run of the mill demonstration. Yes, a lot of the EDL demonstrators were shall we say comfortable with a certain level of physical threat. And there is no justification for throwing bottles and coins at the police just doing their job of protecting the public. But that said this EDL gathering went off much better than most leftist or Islamist riots. Just one policemen was taken to hospital for concussion. One too many, but not exactly Broadwater Farm.

The article above is extremely hazy about what it was that the jailed demonstrators had done to justify the tough sentences. This is strange from a newspaper, The Daily Mail, that generally doesn’t stint on the gory details of wrongdoing. I guess we were just supposed to take comfort from the fact that the racist scum had got their comeuppance.

But see it from the Mail's point of view. How could they say that the EDL demonstrators were being jailed for shouting rude things or throwing a bottle which their readers are well aware are not generally jailable offences these days? As anyone knows that follows court sentencing these days you can commit 100 burglaries, kick somebody senseless or even supply a class A drug that kills a teenager without going to the clink.

Employing vast investigative resources and jailing 50 EDL demonstrators had one object and one object alone. The EDL must be stopped from exercising their right to demonstrate.

Maybe you don’t like the EDL. Maybe you’re happy to see them banged up. But if you are also bothered by the Islamification of Britain, consider this. How would you demonstrate against it?

If you go alone you can be as inoffensive and peaceful as you like. You’ll still be reviled and spat at and then arrested for committing a hate crime. If you go in a group under the banner of the EDL you will be vilified as far-right and attacked by the so called Unite Against Fascism group (UAF) the officially tolerated extralegal enforcers used by the authorities to intimidate any opposition to progressive multiculturalism. The UAF were also violent at the Birmingham rally, but not so you’d notice from our (in)justice system. Ironically the UAF are the closest thing we actually have  in Britain to the Nazi Brownshirts (apart that is from the Islamists).

That’s why every EDL demonstration is violent. Peaceful demonstrations against Islamism or multiculturalism are not possible. And because any demonstration against the status quo is met with violence and hate, only burly ex-football thugs have the balls to go along.

Begging for war

Exercising your freedom of speech no longer allowed. Telling the truth is now a criminal offence. If you don’t believe that just try repeating publicly what the purely Muslim sources the Koran, the hadith and The Life of Mohammad say about their own prophet and his religion.

Peaceful demonstration is also no longer possible and violent demonstrators are banged up.

What does that leave?

If you hate the Islamification of Britain and the authorities have blocked off all peaceful means of protest and persuasion, what do you do?

If you love your country and won’t stand idly by while it is progressively destroyed, what can you do to stop it?

Cameron’s government has left just one possibility. It’s also the only possibility that any dictatorship leaves. Dave has closed off all peaceful avenues of change. The only avenue left open is violent opposition. Dave is either incredibly stupid or wants to create English nationalist terrorists. Hell, maybe they’ll even get to meet the Queen like Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness did.

Dave wants to start a terrorist war on the streets of Britain.

But perhaps before he puts the finishing touches to his Cause sorry Prevent Strategy he should consider what happened in Northern Ireland and magnify that 40 times. The IRA started a terrorist war against the British and loyalist Irish. Northern Irish protestants were being slaughtered on the streets and felt that their way of life was being destroyed. Sound familiar? But it didn’t turn out quite as the IRA had hoped. By the late 80s the protestant terrorists were murdering more than the IRA and they eventually gave up on their dream of a united Ireland.

After more than three thousand deaths…

Maybe time for a rethink of the war plan, Dave.