Nigel sups with the devil
Ukip
are the only hope.
But
they’ve got to get their act together.
Nigel
Farage screwed up the above encounter with the BBC. He comes off shifty because
he’s too careful and diplomatic to do the right thing. The right thing is to
give a straight answer. Something like this perhaps:
“I
am not giving you an interview because Panorama is a hopelessly biased
left-wing propaganda outfit that uses every opportunity to smear my party.”
That’s
what people want from Ukip. In fact, straight talking is just about Ukip’s only
advantage over the entrenched political elite.
Nigel
didn’t give a straight answer to the scumbag pretend-objective Panorama journalist
because he is too cautious. Farage is afraid that the BBC will twist any true
answers he gives to show him in a bad light. In that, of course, he’s
absolutely right.
They
commonly use one or more of the following wheezes against right-wingers. They edit
footage to show them as extremists, as weird, as out of touch, or as just plain
angry and unattractive. In any sort of discussion show despite the fact that a
majority of British support right-wing parties, the BBC will isolate the
conservative voice by surrounding him with lefties like Custer by the Sioux at
the Little Big Horn. So however many barbs the rightie dodges they’re bound to
get him in the end through sheer weight of numbers.
Then
there’s the tactic used in the interview above. Michael Moore-like an everyman type character ambushes his prey in the hope of an irritated or unguarded comment that can be worked
up into the equivalent of a Hitler speech.
With the Beeb on your case it’s
not worth being subtle with your answers. If you dodge their left or
right they’ll just go below the belt or dish out a sucker punch. Like the Sioux
at the Little Big Horn if they don’t get you with one they’ll get you with
another.
But
there is a way to deal with their little games. It’s called blunt talking.
Don’t be afraid of the Beeb, just tell it as it is and all will be well.
Here’s
why blunt talking is a sure fire winner.
First,
Ukip only exists because the British are sick of the lies and clever evasions
of politicians. Its very raison d’etre
is to be open and clear about problems
which the other parties won’t even discuss. If Ukip ducks questions, Ukip has
no reason to exist. And as Margaret Thatcher demonstrated 3 elections in a row, plain speaking gets through to the voter despite and maybe even because of all the media's efforts to distort it. In the European elections Ukip was like the alien invader in Startrek. Every attack on it made it stronger.
Second,
Beeb journalists and leftist politicians live in a liberal bubble and almost
never have to defend their ideas. This leaves them very poorly equipped to
debate right-wingers. In short, if a conservative goes on the attack, they’re
lost. There’s a great illustration of that in Jeremy Paxman’s interview of Ann
Coulter. The Beeb’s big beast experiences the same shock as the hunters in Crocodile Dundee when the kangaroo
shoots back. How dare the conservative not abase herself before Paxo’s
unassailable moral ascendancy!
Third,
the BBC hate having their impartiality questioned. Ramming home this
self-evident truth over and again is like hammering a stake into the heart of
the BBC. Without their still high reputation for objectivity they’ll be seen as
just another RTV or Al Jazeera with an
axe to grind, which of course they are.
Along
with blunt speaking, Ukip also needs to differentiate itself from the Conservatives
in another key way. They’ve got to stop apologizing for their beliefs and in
the words of Andrew Breitbart “Walk towards the fire.” The left’s vile abuse
and vilification must be faced down.
There
was a great example of that on the BBC’s Question Time when Melanie Philips
rounded on a liberal numpty who was making vile accusations about Ukip and its
supporters. It was so inspiring to have somebody hold up mirror to a
hate-filled leftie that even the Question Time audience broke into applause.
The
British famously love the underdog and a pugnacious one even more so. It is
Nigel’s and Ukip’s job to go like Daniel into the lion’s den of liberal
media bias. He has a chance to overthrow the liberal aristocracy, but only if
he remembers two things:
Tell
it like it is.
And.
Walk
towards the fire.
Do
that and talent will flock to the party and people will vote for us.
It's an awkward time for Nigel. I fear that, now that his party has a real prospect for power, he will start to spin and prevaricate like any other politician. The resignation of Godfrey Bloom, ostensibly because he perceives the UKIP as being "too politically correct," is a bad sign. Whether he jumped or was pushed doesn't matter terribly much if his resignation heralds the start of the party losing the plain-speaking oddballs that makes it so interesting.
ReplyDeleteI like the way Melanie Philips cited the word "disgusting," as used by the desperately young audience member, as an instance of vilification. I'd like to suggest that Philips, or anyone else on the right, could go further by interrogating just what this silly word means. One gambit might be to inquire of the person who has used it if they mean that they have been put off their dinner. If the answer is yes, suggest that a case of the collywobbles, though unfortunate (mock-sympathy here), is something easily remedied with a dose of fruit salts and an early night.
I have the same fear that Ukip will start to care overmuch what the talking heads say about them. They have to stop worrying about offending liberals and remember why people vote for them.
ReplyDeleteI'm not so sure the semantics count for so much. Ukip people must confront the nasty idiots of the left. It's tough, but if their claims are left unchallenged, they win.
I wonder if any tea partiers are reading this and taking it to heart? They should.
ReplyDelete